Mr. Caufal’s teaching overall
In my view, Mr. Caufal was a very confident man, I believed
it rooted from his teaching experiences. He understood the main purpose in 5th
grade level and chosen the worth reading news for his students. The text he
chosen not only did relate to a unit of study but also was complex enough to
push his students to learn.
He picked up the important words to help students have
connection between big idea and main idea. Through his observation, he offered
the same complex text to students, but divided students to different groups
according to the amount of text that the students work with. Mr. Caufal tried
to use variety of strategies to engage student learning, in this case he gave
them a time to move around the class to read posters and made them have chance
to exchange their thoughts and learned from their peers. From this example, the
close reading strategy enabled students credibility and let them embrace the
challenge willingly.
Instruction Procedure
- First half of class, everyone had a seat at desk.
1. Let one recite loudly about their first target to have all
students focus. He asked students to catch important words even in topic to lure
their interest.
2. Recall
students’ experience of the close reading to enhance their skills.
3. Asked
students to read entire text without stopping, encouraged them to show their
perseverance.
4. Reread
the text and circled the words that students recognized they were important or
they didn’t understand.
5. Wrote
down the gist for each paragraph in margin. (From the video an
assistant teacher helped the small group separately)
6. Asked
them to write down the main idea in back sheet in short time.
- Second half of class, students transited to carpet area.
1. After
reading, thinking and writing, he started a session for students talking about
the text. As first half of class, he asked a student reciting the second
learning target.
2. Students
paired to share their opinions about what the main idea is in article and one
sentence that helped students to come up the main idea.
3. He
chosen the important details written in posters and hung them in classroom
respectively. Allow students to move around the classroom to read the text and
write down on post about this is important or not to connect the main idea. During
this process.
4. Students
went back to carpet and shared their thinking in a debrief to synthesize
understanding.
Informal
assessment
1.
Can
students read all text independently?
2.
Can
students circle out the new vocabulary without assistance?
3.
Can
students jot their initial sense of text, at least paragraph by paragraph?
4.
Can
students team up with the other classmate and express their ideas?
5.
When
students circulate in class, do they participate well? Can they explain the
questions from posters? Do their answers make connections to main idea?
During carpet session, can students share their
thinking targeted the main idea?
Excellent analysis! Any thoughts on how to use/apply any of his lesson in your class (inthe future)?
ReplyDeleteI did experience this kind of close-reading during ESL class, and I believe it can apply not only in language art but also all subjects because understanding the goal and what the questions ask are important as well.
Delete